1. Immediately after the September 11th event, the Defendants launched their immoral unlawful surveillance against the Plaintiff simply because of his Islamic faith [.]
2. In doing so, the Defendants followed the Plaintiff wherever he went. They recklessly and dangerously chased him on the streets and put his life in an immediate danger without any reason or justification. This event still occurs today. This compelled Abulkhair to report them to the local police. (See the relevant police reports and correspondence presented with the previous pleading [doc. 34]). In addition, they ordered the United States Postal Service to intercept and open his incoming and outgoing mail without a court order. See Abulkhair v. USPS.
3. On December 30, 2013, Plaintiff served the Defendants with the federal tort claims notice (D. Ex A), which was received on *(January 7, 2014)*, [not] ("January 17, 2014"), (see USPS's proof attached with the previous pleading [doc. 34]), to put all of them on notice in order to deter them or face their fate in court. The Defendants ignored it and failed to respond within the time prescribed as required by the law.
4. Not having heard yet from the Defendants for more than nine (9) months and left with no alternative, Abulkhair filed this action on (September 11, 2014) [doc. 1].
5. A week later, on September 18, 2014, the corrupt disqualified "philosopher" Jose Linares dismissed the action [only] on the basis of the "long statement" [doc. 2] and nothing about either "jurisdiction" or "failure to state a claim", etc.
6. The "smart" philosopher Linares's purpose was to assist the strayed Defendants to cover up and to correct their inaction, defect and failure to timely respond to Abulkhair's tort notice by denying it on (September 23, 2014), almost ten (10) months after it was served upon them, and just [only] five (5) days after Linares's dismissal in order to serve the intent for the upcoming Amended Complaint to protect the strayed corrupt Government. This rendered their (out of time) "denial" submitted as Exhibit B within their dismissal motion to [be] barred by law when and where we deal with Defendant[s] who argue, among other things, the "statute of limitations", for which does not apply since Defendants' illegal surveillance has not ceased yet for which continual unlawful surveillance rendered any and all dismissal with or without prejudice obsolete, void, and frivolous at best. It further decisively proved that all of the Defendants, at that point in time, were fully aware of Abulkhair's Action against them since ("September 23, 2014") regardless of its dismissal five (5) days earlier in order to settle and put their useless and previously frivolous dispute about the service of the Amended Complaint to rest.
7. Abulkhair thereafter requested the Chief Judge to recuse the "philosopher", vacate his dismissal based on his disqualification, poor experience, struggle with "long statement" and other issues addressed within his (September 17, 2014 [doc. 3] and October 6, 2014 [doc. 4] letters).
8. By Order on (October 21, 2014) the Chief Judge reassigned the case to Judge Esther Salas and decisively clarified that "Judge Jose L. Linares no longer assigned to case" [doc. 5].
9. Silence his angry feeling within himself regarding the obvious disqualification and incompetency of the reassignment judge, hoping for a decent judge somewhere, who may be familiar with word "integrity" to come forward to issue a compelling order to the idiotic and moronic FBI cowardly animals to cease and desist forthwith their immoral hostility and unlawful surveillance, which molded with their religious discriminatory hatred towards an innocent individual whose life on the line until the outcome of this matter, or at least the corrupt Government presents its (FISA) Court Order to authorize and justify its wrongdoing, but to no avail in the most corrupt strayed "Kangaroo Court", society, and policing state known to the entire modern world.
10. Judge Salas slept on her assignment for almost two (2) years until Abulkhair knocked on the Chief Judge's door on (June 17, 2016) in order to wake her up [doc. 6].
11. On (July 8, 2016), Judge Salas Ordered the Complaint to be amended [doc. 7].
12. On July 29, 2016, Abulkhair filed his Amended Complaint as ordered [doc. 8].
13. Six (6) months later, on (January 4, 2017) Judge Salas Ordered the Clerk to reopen the case and the service of the Amended Complaint followed [doc. 9]. This obviously and clearly meant that the Amended Complaint fit the need and expectation, not only [t]o pass the screening test, but to survive all of [t]he frivolous dismissal motions as well. Thus, all of the named Defendants had been properly served with the Summons and the Amended Complaint timely as required, at that point in time.
14. The "U.S. Attorney" [was] the [first] to be serve[d] with the Summons and the Amended Complaint on behalf of all of the Defendants and The United States of America in particular timely as required on "3/3/2017" and their answer was due "5/2/2017". [N]o answer is filed at that point in time until now. All of the Defendants were defaulted except two of them, but Judge Salas is not the qualified Judge to enforce the rules against the "Kangaroo Government" fearing to lose her status as an appeasement judge standing for corrupt government and corporation as we had "firsthand" knowledge experience with her. More importantly though, her failure to abide by the Rules of Court intended to protect the corrupt government official Defendants in which protection articulated, illustrated, and demonstrated bias as simple as is the case here. This bias divested her impartiality to remain presiding over Abulkhair's matters, plain and simple.
15. Assuming two (2) years combined with another additional six (6) months period is more than enough time for an amateur state judge, not a ("federal judge"), to carefully and adequately review and screen the genuine dismissed and amended claims as required by the federal statute before ordering the service of the Amended Complaint to minimize the judiciary resources and lighten the litigant's burden from filing one defective pleading after another. To foolishly come afterward pretending to be persuaded by a "professional liar" who transcripted his same exact baseless dismissal motion every time to challenge all different claims and allegations relying [ONLY] on his corrupt government's "reality" theory of all of the corrupt "firstborn Satan" federal judges [are] indeed in the wrongdoers' pocket, is an acknowledgment of how the actual "Kangaroo Court" operates for which satanic operation constitutes a clear deviation of what the rule of law and the genuine judiciary represented.
16. Judge Salas was confronted thereafter with a motion to dismiss and a cross-motion to enter a default and more importantly to compel the corrupted government to provide its (FISA) Court Order to be utilized as the legitimate and genuine threshold the Defendants must meet before dismissing Abulkhair's case against them to legalize their illegal hostilities and activities towards an American Citizen living in America for more than three (3) decades with [NO] criminal record, except ONLY of being one of a kind [MOSLEM].. Nothing more –––– and nothing less. Judge Salas's failure to uphold and honor this essential threshold requirement rendered her disqualification to preside over Abulkhair's matters. Her wrong frivolous dismissal amounted to unfounded legislation from her bench authorizing the immoral satanic, idiotic and moronic FBI animals "In Tatter" to surveillance an American Citizen as Abulkhair without obtaining the (FISA) Court Order because he was born a [Moslem]. Judge Salas failed to recognize this simple fact for which the cases she presides over are all about. Her recusal cannot be escaped under any and all circumstances * (with a sincere apology to the animals who could identify and distinguish between foe and friend, unlike the FBI). *
17. Upon reopening the case in the beginning of 2017 and due to the unforgettable and regrettable past experience with Judge Salas's own legislation deny[ing] pro se litigants of taking deposition of their defendants or witnesses which ended in disaster, Abulkhair made an extensive research searching for a decent legal representation everywhere in the county and even abroad contacting all of the hypocrite "professional liars" who handle high profile cases. Unknown to him at that time, but was highly expecting one of those fraudulent "professional liars" had contacted the failure FBI agency and alerted them of Abulkhair's unrelenting efforts to hire an attorney for merely deposing the idiotic and moronic "firstborn Satan" abusive of their power by abolishing the (FISA) to cover up for their undisputed and unquestionable failure to protect the American People from the criminals and wrongdoers similar to them, Defendant James B. Comey and Defendant Robert S. Mueller, who abused their trusted power to willfully violate the law and the constitution, federal and state, to ironically investigates the alleged crimes involved the unfavorable (to him), the prevailed "bully" [ARBUGY] sits in the Oval Office together with his own abusive failure FBI "Secret Society" "In Tatters" which willfully, intentionally, and deliberately foot-stepping on the (FISA). We now know who they are and we know they got paid from the Defendant "FBI" for releasing confidential communication protected by the "Attorney-Client Privilege" slogan. Thanks to the valued released and declassified controversial "memo" crucial evidence. Of course, they were right about their bogus "Grave Concerns" about the harm will cause to them and their wet mudded reputation, [not] the public. But, they were definitely wrong because it has exposed their immoral childish behavior for their "improper text messages with their mistress" and their intent failure to abide by the rule of law by disregarding the (FISA) influenced and motivated by their politics views, intentions and desires to pick and choose to whom to govern and to whom to investigate or rather put him under their surveillance to fit their outrageous "Kangaroo Group" or "Secret Society" and abuse of power for which are no longer remain secret. Simply, their "Grave Concerns" [is] designed and intended to keep the public blindsided about their immoral and illegal misconduct deliberately orchestrated in [t]he absence of the proper probable cause. In essence, with that in mind, the "memo" shall compel the Congress to dismantle the fancy FBI "Secret Society" or at least rename "The Federal Bureau of Sexual Predators" before the "Kangaroo Society" and "Secret Society" fall aparts "In Tatters".
18. Abulkhair immediately noticed the extremely unusual tampering, blocking and freezing of his email, which was chiefly used to communicate with randomly chosen attorneys to handle his matter against the corrupt government. This led directly to bring a lawsuit against the email provider who blocked Abulkhair's access to his own email property and placed it under "disabled" status to satisfy the need of the shameful corrupted government in order to prevent Abulkhair from hiring an attorney to deal with the strayed outlaw FBI officers and agents. See Abulkhair v. Google.
19. Speaking of Google, while the corrupt Government and the FBI dismissal motion and Abulkhair's cross-motion were pending, Abulkhair made it clear to the Clerk's Office orally and in writing to appoint new judge to preside over Google case. They thought that they were dealing with a naïve litigant to convince him that their judges are "randomly chosen" where the manipulative process and obvious evidence can lead anywhere else but random. Their illogical random choice ended unfortunately with Judge Salas "randomly" to secure another outcome.
20. The lazy Salas then continues her usual pattern of abandoning, deserting, and neglecting the procedures until receiving another cry to perform her forgotten and deserted duty and responsibility towards the court and the parties. She had failed and defeated in both directions.
21. Regardless of the unbearable awful and painful history and experience at the hand of the same old incompetent, prejudicial and biased judge, [t]here can be [no] question whatsoever that Judge Salas's unprofessional care, skill, and knowledge of the law exercised in presiding and handling both of Abulkhair's matters miserably [fell] outside [t]he average professional decent or logical judge anywhere or even [a] junior law school "professional liar" by any standard. The records of both cases speak for themselves.
22. Nearly two (2) months after Google suit was filed, in his inquiry of (October 31, 2017) in which was ignored or rather disregarded, Abulkhair wrote to urge the Clerk to [:]
"Please be advised that our previous recommendation [t]o "assign the above-entitled case to an honorable judge who has never presided over any matter relative to the undersigned pro se litigant" was overlooked. It was designed to prevent "delay" and "prejudice" in order [t]o obviate such an unnecessary request thereafter [.]"' Id. [doc. 2].
23. Having not yet heard from either the Clerk or the Court, Abulkhair was compelled to file another inquiry to [:]
"Please reassign the above-entitled case to a new judge in Camden, Philadelphia or New York in order to move the process and restore the undersigned email address as soon as possible." Id. [doc. 3].
24. A week later, finally, Judge Salas arose to the action by an Order entered on November 22, 2017 [doc. 4], but it was too little, and too late since the bastard satanic FBI had already penetrated Abulkhair's secondary and [ONLY] email left to be eventually blocked a month afterward. This meant that their unrelenting willful and intentional mission to prevent Abulkhair from hiring or even communicating with an attorney is accomplished with merit.
25. Meanwhile, Abulkhair was appealing the Magistrate Judge's decision filed on (May 16, 2017) [doc. 30], who, by the way, still remains the "philosopher" Linares's loyal amateur advisor acting on both cases on Linares's behalf to please and appease the corrupt government to ease and cease the (IRS) pursue and pressure towards him for his dishonest and unreported income gained outside of his judicial bench.
26. It took Judge Salas a total of five (5) and a half long months to enter her denial on (October 30, 2017) [doc. 37] to get even and retaliate against Abulkhair's legitimate inquires to expedite the process in Google matter as stressed above.
27. Abulkhair took the initiative to file his appeal on (November 28. 2017) [doc. 38] and alerted the appellate court that there still remained motion to dismiss and another cross-motion to enter a default against the defaulting Defendants in the matter. Abulkhair also questioned why the other pending motions were not yet decided to save the judiciary resources and to file one single appeal.
28. Abulkhair made it clear below to the District and above to the Circuit that no one has the authority, [not] eve[n] the Congress to dismiss Abulkhair Action against the wrongdoers Defendants in the absence of the (FISA) Court Order. [T]his [is] the Rule of Law [.] [I]t is [NOT] and must [NOT] be [t]he legislation from the bench to override the well settled principle. [W]ith that in mind [,] Judge Salas and "philosopher" Linares [see] otherwise.
29. While the appeal of the appeal of the Magistrate Judge and Judge Salas's decisions still remained pending concerning almost the same exact controversial issues debated below and above, Judge Salas seized the opportunity to cut the chase by dismissing the FBI matter on (February 6, 2018) [doc. 39 and 40] for which neither had been served upon Abulkhair.
30. To this very day, neither the opinion nor the dismissal Order was ever served upon the Plaintiff Abulkhair by the Clerk or her law clerk. Nor has Google's dismissal motion received. Judge Salas is not oblivious regarding the ongoing fact that the same wrongdoers Defendants intercept, tamper, open and delay Abulkhair's incoming and outgoing mail without [a] court order. See Abulkhair v. USPS. As a matter of fact, if Judge Salas's decision was entered on the 6th of February, it would have been appeared on pacer system on the 7th or 8th, but it was not until (February 9th, 2017) to timely appear together with the dismissal motion filed by Google. Judge Salas was withholding her decision until Google filed its dismissal motion to jam Abulkhair with a double pleading for her mess, amendment and response to Google. The question remained, why now? It is too cold outside for her to leave the bed, Ms. Judge. Unlike, the resilient idiotic and moronic "firstborn Satan" FBI coward animals remain waiting, running and chasing Abulkhair day and night everywhere he goes despite the brutal cold. They even drive recklessly in their effort to prevent him from observing their license plate numbers.
31. Reading from the pacer entry, revealing the dismissal of "Plaintiff's Bivens claims with prejudice" shows how far the satanic, immoral corrupt "firstborn Satan" judges can go against their will and consciences to protect the wrongdoers who benefitted the most. Sound familiar, it smells "philosopher" Linares's action, not Salas, to secure them again since their bogus immunity does [NOT] immune them from those claims. That is what he had done in his five (5) days initially for a quick dismissal to allow the corrupt government to respond to the (FTCA) Notice.
32. Whether the timing was motivated or orchestrated or meant to be rushed immediately after the release of the congressional "memo" to cover up the dirty laundry exploded onto the street to entertain the entire world about the "Secret Society" in operation to degrade and bury the rule of law with the integrity of the entire American Judicial System beneath the wetted mud where it belongs, Judge Salas's dismissal fell outside of the Alphabetic Procedure of the legal parameter and deviated her from the Rules of Court she shall abide by and adhere to, regardless of whomever defended or prosecuted the action. Judge Salas [h]as failed the test.
33. To show further her contempt and disrespect towards the legal process and the appellate court, Judge Salas is fully aware of the pending appeal concerning her denial of the appeal of her magistrate judge's ruling. To intentionally determine to retain jurisdiction in order to challenge the appellate courts outcome before eve[n] surface into the light by dismissing Abulkhair's action altogether with prejudice and without, undoubtedly constitutes an absolute action of interfering and intermeddling with the subject of the appeal. Judge Salas lacked jurisdiction to grant the corrupt government with its wrongdoers Defendants' motion. She has in fact crossed [t]he red line of the proper procedures willingly and on her own time and term to defeat and impedes the judicial process. Nevertheless, Judge Salas has indeed acted without jurisdiction, and her solely abusive action and deviated dismissal stand for an abuse of discretion and must be void, plain and simple.
34. There are many dogs out there, usually critics barking of any recusal motion by reasoning their delusional theory of such an "unhappy with the Court's rulings" to fit the event. The blatant records and facts demonstrated here totally disagreed with this useless assumption and proved otherwise. In fact, the disqualification and recusal of Judge Salas is long overdue warranted.
35. This recusal motion does [not] require an authorization from any power and should be published as their publication of the complaints as well their opinions and wronging against us, with or without the consent of the satanic corrupt government or its spoiled FBI boys to assist others who blindsided of the deception and "fake news" intended to cover up for the crime committed on a daily basis against all American Moslems for no reason whatsoever, except adhering to their religion of [I]slam, plain and simple [.] Nothing more –––– and nothing less [.] It should also assist the pro se litigants to know that they have the right to file a similar recusal, and likewise to alert the law schools everywhere to teach their new graduate "professional liars" on how to read and understand long statements. More importantly though, no American Moslem should engage or involve in any kind of betrayal to his soul before his religion by spying on his community for those who have the will and intention to footstep over their privacy and civil rights to discriminate against him and his religion to win their "War Against Islam". The undersigned's application for citizenship made history for being pending the "FBI security clearance" for the entire ten (10) years where no single one of the fake and foolish "home of the brave" ever stood up to say this is immoral and wrong. If you follow the rules to qualify for the citizenship, do not hesitate to grab it from the lion's mouth by law. You have no reason or obligation to fall in any trap. When you "see something" do not dare to say anything. Under no obligation, it is [NOT] your duty. It is the duty of those who willfully violate the law and deliberately infringe your constitutional rights to discriminate against your religion and place you under their surveillance for the obvious probable cause of being a [Moslem] without ever bothering to obtain the (FISA) Court Order. Then, when you dare to sue them, your case will "randomly" be referred to either the king or the queen of dismissal, Linares or Salas, to dismiss it with prejudice.
36. Whoever has a little doubt about this reality, he does not need to buy any of Abulkhair's factual statements. It is fair enough to have one's life on the line as far as much greater cause to alert other victims to be aware of the real animals among and around us. But he can at least consider or give insight a look to one of their own conviction and conclusion; and more importantly though, his remarkable crucial "finding of fact" concerning another fellow victimized Moslem litigant which cannot and must not be ignored.
37. It appeared beyond all doubts that this gentleman tried to escape the unbearable injustice and oppression imposed upon him, like Abulkhair, by the most corrupted strayed State in the Union called itself, ("New Jersey"). He ran into the neighboring sister the State of (New York). He was fortunate to find a decent judge still alive and well in the country. Instead of declining to review his case for the obvious mistake made by the clerk there to accept his complaint in the first place and take the ordinary dismissal procedure, the honorable judge decided to transfer his matter where it belonged. He knew and understood that the dignity and integrity of the judiciary he represented has long, "Gone with the Wind" as the heated 2016 Election debate between Republicans and Democrats openly declared to the entire world [:] "Our Justice System Is Corrupt" –––– "We Have Corrupt Justice System", etc. He felt the urgency to fulfil his waken conscience to honor self-integrity with these painful operative words of fact finder [:]
"Every decision of the trial court was arbitrary and capricious, the entire case was held in a cloak of secrecy with the letter of the law in the dumpster." Id.
38. Unaware of the crux influenced the "Kangaroo Darkness" his case landed and transferred to, he thought he had a big shot to enter a default against the "State of New Jersey" when it failed to answer his complaint. He was not aware, unlike other sister states, the corrupt "firstborn Satan" judges of the District Court of New Jersey are reluctant or rather prohibited to default neither state nor federal government for their own obvious reason regardless of eroding the public's confidence and trust in the judiciary. Of course, there is of course something wrong with this ugly, horrific, and discriminatory picture. But, no one cares or concerns about as long as they are representing minority group, especially [Moslems]. He eventually pleaded to persuade "Linares" further within his affidavit relying on the New Yorker honorable judge's finding by referring to him that [:]
"He also noted my concern that I was singled out for such cruel and unusual punishment simply because I am an American Muslim. This is what I am experiencing presently with NJDC". Id.
39. Once a decent conscientious federal judge admitted that "the letter of the law" of course, along with the constitution had ended "in the dumpster" to willfully and deliberately discriminate against all "American" [Moslem] litigant[s] to deprive them of their rights and equal protection of the laws under the unfounded banner or the unrealistic symphony of "justice for all", the integrity before the impartiality of the Court itself and Venue must come into question to justify the recusal of Judge Salas and to depart from Linares corrupt and "Kangaroo Court" forthwith.
40. Given the foregoing truthful fact, [NOT] "Abulkhair's bare assertion", articulated, orchestrated, illustrated and demonstrated here, the consequence of leaving Judge Salas when, in fact, the "philosopher" ("Linares") who the one actually presiding over Abulkhair's matters, will already further degrade the vanished image of the United States Judicial System and erode much deeper, not only the public's confidence and trust in the judiciary, but also abroad as well where no country in the world would be able to jeopardize its citizens welfare or to expedite any criminal suspect to the United States. This will lead and serve as a vehicle to automatically shift the venue to the International Court, if necessary, to seek real justice where Abulkhair's genuine claims in both matters like all other victimized Moslems explicit with issues and civil and human rights which fall directly under the International Laws where the United States is signatory to protect its own citizens. When it fails as the New Yorker Judge conceded, the International Court supersedes and should take over.
41. Judge Salas or rather Linares's dismissal is not only depriving Abulkhair's of his right "to be left alone" without being, day and night, chased by the idiotic and moronic FBI agents' vehicles on the streets everywhere, but rather setting unprecedented ruling by abolishing the (FISA) to authorize FBI's surveillance without bothering to apply for its authorization. We need them to follow the rule of law. They do not have to be ashamed to present to the (FISA) Court Judge that the [Religion] of [ISLAM] is [t]he [ONLY] probable cause we have to launch our surveillance against Abulkhair. At this juncture, the corrupt government could claim that they have some defense to defend the action against it. In the absence of the (FISA) Court Order, all of the district court fake and frivolous procedural rules and "the letter of the law" led to the dismissal must end "in the dumpster" since the threshold (FISA) to authorize the unlawful surveillance has not been met by the wrongdoers Defendants, but rather it was deliberately foot-stepping on by them to obviate the (FISA), plain and simple.
42. On (September 11, 2001), Defendants' vehicle was parked with its motor running all night long under Abulkhair apartment's windows. This alone gave the impression that they had already rushed to the (FISA) Court earlier and obtained the order authorizing their surveillance. A "reasonable" judge would have signed such an urgency order under the extremely unprecedented pressure, hatred and hostility toward [ISLAM] generated from the out leach frenzy Zionist medial which controlled and managed by the sexual predators, at that point in time. According to (FISA), the statute required a FISA order on an American citizen must be renewed by the ISC every 90 days and each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause. Former-Director-Defendant Robert S. Mueller should have signed the initial FISA application on behalf of the FBI, and his successor former-Director-Defendant James B. Comey should have signed each renewal application on behalf of the FBI afterward leading to the filing of the lawsuit in question. At this juncture, the Defendants should have obtained by now approximately sixty-six (66) (FISA) Court Orders to authorize and legalize their surveillance and hostility towards Abulkhair. To that end, once Abulkhair filed his cross-motion to challenge their unlawful surveillance, Judge Salas's obligatory duty is to demand the Defendants to meet the challenge by representing (66) (FISA) Court Orders in an open court to comply and abide by the requirement mandated by the federal statute before rendering any judgment on the matter. Once the Defendants fail to comply with the mandated requirement, the only choice will be left before Judge Salas, is to deny the dismissal motion with its entity and enter a partial summary judgment on the Court's own motion concerning liability and to schedule the matter for trial before the jury to decide the damages owed to Abulkhair. Since the entry of the pacer system did not mention anything regarding Abulkhair's cross-motion, it appeared Judge Salas did not even bother to read it, or as usual labeled and put it as "moot". Judge Salas failed miserably to honor or even abide by the plain requirements mandated by (FISA) to impose her and their will to enforce an unlawful and immoral surveillance, which clearly stands for an abuse of discretion and power as well for which rendered all of her decisions in this matter to be void.
43. The corrupt government's purse of Abulkhair with no end in sight put them directly under the microscope to question the legality and morality of their motive for squandering the taxpayers' money by utilizing the neglected virtue of common sense to sense the imaginary delusional goal they desperately wanted to achieve for which the goal does [NOT] exist in the real world. They do, however, have the right to launch all kinds of surveillances against Abulkhair and other Moslem brothers. But, we do also have the absolute right to make sure that their surveillance [MUST] be [ORDERED] under the (FISA) requirements. At this juncture, [i]t is [NOT]. This is what this case is all about [.]
44. Abulkhair [NEVER] saw or touched a gun, and [NEVER] will, except in action Egyptian or Hollywood movies. Abulkhair personally does [NOT] believe in "Self-Defense" theory [NOR] the "Second Amendment", and [NEVER] will. Abulkhair [NEVER] have a cell phone, and [NEVER] will, and refused the offer of "Free Phone" trap. In turn, "Litigious" status does [NOT] fit his ideal personality, nor belong to what values and principles he stands for and comes from. Each and all of the wrongdoers "firstborn Satan" defendants he dragged and brought them forward to face justice in the "court of law" or rather the "Kangaroo Court", were hardly crying, weeping like women, and desperately bagging him to do so. The blatant records clearly substantiated these undisputable facts. The idiotic and moronic FBI officers and agents are fully aware of the aforementioned facts at the time his application for citizenship was filed [a] week from the event of September 11. The [ONLY] crime he committed, along with the other American Moslem brothers and sisters, [is] adhering [t]o the Religion of [ISLAM] to which be considered [a] legitimate "probable cause" for them to trigger their illegal surveillance for seventeen (17) straight years in order to retaliate for the event of September 11.
45. To this end and with that in mind, ironically, in addition to their unwant[ed] and unwarrant[ed] invasion of privacy and harassment of chasing him [Abulkhair] with their vehicles on the streets everywhere he goes, on a daily basis, day and night, the idiotic and moronic failure of intelligent agencies determined to monitor, chase and block an innocent "Moslem" man's personal emails, and to leave [a] "Jewish" criminal monster who loaded his hotel room with (47) guns to shoot down (58) innocent human beings and injured more than five hundred. Not to mention all the endless school shooters with others thereafter, where the fallen victim's numbers have exceeded those who died on September 11 at least three (3) times, for which we are being profiled and discriminated for. Those innocent lives taken were absolutely victims of a direct failure of the federal failure agency, the so-called "FBI," alone because they are distracting themselves with harmless peaceful people like Abulkhair, plain and simple, whether is long or "short statement" cited. Of course, there is something wrong with this immoral and horrific picture no one wants to talk about, as no one dares to describe him as a "terrorist" because he was not a typical "Moslem." More importantly though, this hateful and spiteful animal's email account was [not] even "noticed" for [i]ts "unusual activity" or violation of the "Services Agreement" or tampered with by the "smart" FBI, or "Google" [t]o prevent the "firstborn Satan" satanic massacre [h]e freely premeditated and orchestrated as usually and bogusly they claimed to justify their violations of the laws and the long dead "Constitution" of the United States. [W]e now [k]now that all "held in a cloak of secrecy with the letter of the law in the dumpster." Id. Nor had it been placed on any "suspended" or "disabled" status when he purchased all of his arsenals through his email account. SHAME ON YOU !![!] In essence, the clear message intended to be conveyed by the wrongdoers clearly implied that American Moslems are [NOT] covered under the protection umbrella of the law, precisely the (FISA) in particular. In support, the District Court's dismissal of their meritorious and legitimate complaints all over the country with[out] appointing the assistance of counsel, implied that American Moslems are [NOT] covered under the unrealistic banner of deceptive deception that "justice for all" or "the equal protection of the laws" where neither can be found. SHAME ON YOU !![!]
46. With all due respect to the Rules of Court if [ONLY] the Court abides by and adheres to in order to be enforced fairly and equally upon all parties. To be abused and only used as a tool to discriminate against one group in particular to benefit another, they must be ended "in the dumpster" as the honest decent New Yorker Judge simplified. To this end, the Rules of Court, federal and state, are [not] jurisdictional to file a complaint in neither court. The federal statutes are the jurisdiction. Here, at the case at hand, despite his prior recusal and disqualification, "philosopher" Linares used and abused Rule 12 and Rule 8 and initially dismissed the complaint on his notion of "failure to state a claim" when in fact it is "failure to adjudicate" properly. He reasoned and limited his historical dismissal justification on the [ONLY] basis of the "long statements" because the rules recognized that the federal judges' brains limited to comprehend the sentences of the first grade pupils to impose "short sentences" instead. Nothing more ––– and Nothing less. Judge Salas was fully aware of that fact. Once she found that the "failure to state a claim" or "deficiency" continued, she should have rejected the Amended Complaint and ordered another amendment before serving the defective pleading since an innocent litigant's life on the line at the highest risk here. The rest has become history addressed above.
47. Regardless of the fabricated preposterous notion that the abusive federal justices and judges provide a special leniency for pro se litigants' pleading, which is totally untrue or rather does not exist. Otherwise, this nuisance unnecessary memorandum would have been prevented and obviated. On the contrary, [t]o find and rule "failure to state a claim" addressing pro se claims, the qualification of care, skill, conduct and knowledge of the law of that judge [MUST] be relevant to such ruling. Neither "philosopher" Linares [NOR] Judge Salas ever filed [a] single complaint, claim or motion in any district court in the county. Similarly, the nominee judge for the circuit court who testified before the Congress, that he never filed a single complaint, claim or motion in any federal or even state court. Then, he will come later to affirm the determination of those amateur judges who have zero or rather lacked experience and knowledge of the law about how to file any papers anywhere, except for the Social Security retirement application with the help of the staff. For instance, "philosopher" Linares first counter with Abulkhair when he "dismissed with prejudice" his Social Security claims demanded Abulkhair to file a "motion to reopen the appeal" instead. The appellate court reversed him along with Judge Salas's predecessor. The second counter surfaced when "philosopher" Linares "dismissed with prejudice" Abulkhair's removed complaint from state court to federal court. The appellate court reversed him again. "Unhappy" with the reversal decisions, one after another, [h]e "philosopher" [Linares], by his dictatorially nature had decided to take the extreme measure to prevent Abulkhair's filing without his approval first because Abulkhair has suddenly become a litigious person. So, he [Abulkhair] should accept the brutal or rather the "cruel and unusual punishment" of oppression and injustice and to remain silent to ask for more and more to embolden the wrongdoers to continue on their strayed path to wrong others, who will blame someone as him for not standing firm to face and kneel them, with or without their consent. The appellate court compelled him [Linares] to back off and lectured him with a great citation quoted by another sister circuit to admonish him along with those judges who have the will and intention to betray the oath they have sworn to uphold, and discretionally strayed in prohibited terrain, in order to please and appease others at the expense of the little litigants to benefit themselves and their former "law firms" to retaliate and to become even with their opponents.
48. On the other hand, Judge Salas's experience and knowledge of the law was tested as early as when she was assigned as a "magistrate judge". When Abulkhair challenged the "professional liar" opponent's own signature certified the interrogatories on behalf of her client, Judge Salas questioned her whether under the state rules counsel's signature is accepted on the interrogatory answers. Everybody knows that all of the "professional liars" provide answers to interrogatories on behalf of their clients to protect them, but we need their signatures, not the "professional liars" signatures. To make a mockery of the entire federal judicial system, Judge Salas would not allow [a] pro se litigant to take [a] deposition of any witnesses unless he or she is licensed as [a] "professional liar" unlike the state rules. The useless corrupt Supreme "gay and lesbian" Court refused to answer this important, simple and crucial public concern question where the coward "professional liars" could not dare to stand up to the corrupt government, except pro se litigants, unless the litigant can afford to buy them and they sell him later with [a] guarantee compensation from the government for selling their clients. Judge Salas's philosophy and desire is to impose her own legislation requiring the pro se litigants to provide their claims perfectly without deficiency similarly to the "professional liars" as equally as exactly the same. Meanwhile, her unique legislation prohibits them to take the deposition of any witnesses, conversely, allowing their opponents to take their deposition without any protection of assistant lawyers because the intent is to deprive them from their legal rights to add another violation of the constitution and laws which compelled them to have some recourse to the district court. Hence, if the judges, in question, lacked care, skill, experience and knowledge as obviously clear here, then what failure or deficiency can be noted or detected by them of any claims when, in fact, they never filed a single claim on their own in a federal court and probably a state court as well. Frankly, neither Linares nor Salas is qualified to even be assigned to a Municipal Court bench for the reasons addressed here.
49. This must not be construed as someone "unhappy" with the never ended unfavorable decisions for which represented [ONLY] the ugly face of the unbearable oppression and injustice imposed by ignorant, corrupt and disqualified judges upon victimized litigants, plain and simple. When the renowned universities of law school websites all over the country eager to publish Abulkhair's complaints labeled them as [:] "Historical and Topical" where the "firstborn Satan" judges (who never filed a single complaint or motion in federal court) come later to review and think, to claim and rule otherwise, the proper conclusion would lead to where the problem must have laid. The publication would not be accomplished without the authorization of the professors at law there who teach the "professional liars" on how to construct claims before they bribe their appointee politicians to assign them to the bench. With all humility and humble to the earth as could be, without any exaggeration, there will never be a "professional liar" alive or dead is capable to construct even a closer "Historical and Topical" federal complaint similar to the one filed against the satanic monopoly email provider called "Google" gigantic. We cannot and must not allow the corrupt one whose recusal sought here, namely, Judge Salas to adjudicate this phenomenon masterpiece of a human tragedy with its unique, unprecedented, unparalleled and unattainable beauty essay, prosed exceptionally its obvious painful topic of an extraordinarily constructed legal saga, representing the nuisance ordeal we must counter, and to eventually defeat the wrongdoers' sickness mentality and morality among us. Before pointing out the frivolous justification of "failure to state a claim", cover your face with a black robe or old fashion (hijab) from head to toe before your smell will drain the oceans from the East Coast to the West Coast.
50. The [ONLY] option available [w]e generously offer to Judge Salas to escape her inevitable recusal, [is] to reverse her dismissal forthwith, and compel the corrupt government to come forward with their sixty-six (66) (FISA) Court Orders issued as early of ("September 11, 2001") to show, convince, and persuade the federal judicial system that the Defendants have some sort of legitimate defense to the Action in order to prove that she is willing to follow the law and abide by the rule of law, [NOT] hers. Despite the deception portrayed by most deceptive justices and judges referring their decisions to the will of Congress to cover their own legislation from the bench, the Congress itself, the Constitution or the Statute, federal and state, does [NOT] and must [NOT] have the power to compel Abulkhair to proceed with neither disqualified "philosopher" Linares or Salas.
51. Once the judge disqualification and impartiality come into question by any litigant or even witness in the matter, the integrity of the entire judiciary system automatically becomes on the line, not [ONLY] the judge himself. Judge Salas's disqualification and impartiality dragged into question far long before any of her controversial and biased decisions surfaced upon the ground. In his district appeal of (May 16, 2017) [doc. 30], Abulkhair pleaded in paragraph (8) [:]
"[T]he matter here unambiguously calls upon the Court to appoint a judge who has zero tolerance towards wrongdoing and the wrongdoers no matter who they are in the same way the new [bully] in the White House recently did regardless of the outcry of the hypocrites. We correctly predicted exactly that this would happen in one of the unique pleading [Memorandum] in order to deter [t]he satanic perverters of justice dated (October 14, 2016) [b]efore the controversial presidential election took place where we indicated there [:]
"The rest is a systematic failure system leads directly to [a] "Kangaroo Society" that must be ruled by [a] bully to fit [no] matter what the interest of the special groups, media dislike or resist as no one should be wondering about it." Id.
52. Abulkhair adequately expressed one of the many prejudicial reasons to question her qualification and most important impartiality in his paragraph (9) [:]
"The current judge does [not] believe that the pro se litigants deserve the absolute rights under the law to depose the witnesses –––– [u]nless to be officially "licensed" as [a] "professional liar" for which unfounded theory will never be applicable to this matter under any and all circumstances. Her alternative "written deposition questions" cannot and must [not] be accepted, except by [a] naïve moron litigant. Otherwise, the Court will be compelled to appoint a pro bono counsel to conduct the deposition of the witnesses in this matter for which demand has never been requested yet, despite an order entered denied so based on [a] misunderstanding of the English Language by the magistrate judge who worked for Linares as misinterpreted Abulkhair's conclusion in his letter dated January 30, 2017 regarding [t]he future discovery (doc.11):
"As the matter moves forward with the complex of issues in obtaining discovery and the extensiveness of constitutional substances and decisive laws governed federal and state prosecuting Defendants considering themselves (above the law), the Court within its sound discretion should appoint a pro bono counsel on its own motion. " Id.
53. Abulkhair further clarified and simplified the genuine concern in his paragraph (10) [:]
"Unlike the President of the United States, we normally do not pick and choose judges, as the "professional liars" construed as someone who is "unhappy with the court's decisions" –––– in which definitely is [not] the case herein. Even though, we were sure that the reassigned judge is not the proper choice for this historical and unprecedented matter. Despite all of that, we have given her the benefit of doubts until the rushed arbitrarily recent Orders emerged and entered, which certainly were deviated from the basic alphabetic Rules of Court and the Rule of Law. They have proved beyond all doubts that the current assigned judge cannot be effectively presided or even trusted over this unique, unprecedented and unparalleled matter in the short history of the federal judiciary of this nation." Id.
54. Abulkhair continued tackling and confronting the core substance surrounded Judge Salas's undoubted disqualification to preside over the "FBI" case in his paragraph (11) [:]
"The current President of the United States vigorously launched his unprecedented attacks towards one of the federal judges accusing him of being "biased" for his Latin heritage. We dissent from this character assassination. We, however, undoubtedly believe that a bilingual judge adhered to any culture or a distinguished background is not capable to serve the interest of justice in certain cases with no exception to the one at hand, especially in a diverse and controversial society like the one exited here in the U.S. These bilingual judges usually come from a brutal dictatorship background that molded and shaped their personality with a totally different approach and attitude leading in an opposite direction towards others, one way or another, for the better or the worse. The fear factor from their previous oppressive dictators' experience remained intact within throughout their life and career. Neither impartiality nor independence can be existed, lived or flourished inside such a contaminated environment." Id.
55. Abulkhair then stressed his well experienced conclusion and challenged the Court's deviation from the Rules of Court in his paragraph (12) and (13) where Judge Salas, like other judges, let their lacked experience magistrate judges to decide a turning point of a crucial appealable issue to later affirm it in order to fool the litigant, especially pro se to prevent him from taking his appeal directly to the circuit court [:]
"Unlike them, [w]e fear [no] one –––– The fear itself fear[s] us. When the fear rises up to challenge us –––– we [must] crush it by [our] values and principles –––– no matter [w]hat power may or may not stand behind [.]" Id.
"[U]nless there is an existing statute, citation or rule anywhere specifically authorizing the court to allow a ["failure"] to file an answer to a complaint on the basis that the defending representation [shall] wait until such time to file and serve an [one] answer on behalf of all defendants regardless of the expiration date –––– all of the defaulted Defendants' Answer [must] be stricken with [a] default Order –––– and the amateur frivolous Orders [must] be reversed forthwith without regard [.]" Id.
56. Whoever disagrees with this well-done analysis has every right to dissent. [B]ut, he shall [NOT] enforce his emotional right or mindset view upon others to impose an oppression and injustice to retaliate against people's "strong language" or "sharp language" as one judge reviewed. We did [NOT] go to the district court to judge nor adjudicate our language. We went eagerly, bravely and proudly there to peacefully petition the out leach "Kangaroo" strayed and corrupt government to question the legality of its unwarranted "surveillance", which targeting all decent American Moslems living in this United States of (!!!/???) for long decades with no criminal history or "probable cause" except one called ["ISLAM"]. All we need to know is whether the government has the proper (FISA) Order to permit her FBI boys to chase its citizens with their vehicles everywhere they go using them as a deadly weapon. Judge Salas does [NOT] believe we are entitled to such [a] demand to hold the wrongdoers accountable for their abusive action and conduct and intentional disregard of the Statute in question.
57. We are entitled to serve our interrogatories and take the deposition of the "formidable" Defendant Robert S. Mueller, who desperately wanted to question the [bully] sitting in the White House to satisfy the delusional sore loser of the election, which faded away; meanwhile, [h]e used and abused his power to discriminate against certain group then to violate or rather abolish the (FISA) mandatory requirements to further manipulate the process to prevent himself to be questioned and held accountable for infringing with almost eight (8) million American Moslems' rights and privacy for a crime they did [NOT] commit. [T]he one who breaks the law shall [NOT] be trusted to enforce the law [.] They should have investigated him first before appointed him to check whether any lawsuits were pending against him for violations of the constitutional rights, statutes and laws or abuse of power during his director's supervisionary power. They failed. The same applied fairly and equally to his successor Defendant James B. Comey, with no exception to other Defendants. Unlike the New Yorker Judge, Judge Salas fell far behind the acceptable standard line with no fair comparison to be drawn here.
58. No litigant should have to bear the agony and the inordinate amount of time spent to prepare a recusal application against any judge federal or state. Once the judge becomes aware of his questionable qualification and impartiality, he must step down forthwith without waiting the filing of any recusal, similarly to the overseas judiciaries we often criticize without realizing the fact that they do have far much better judiciary than us here. There, [w]hen the judge hears that his impartiality becomes the center of attention or distraction drags into question in the courtroom, he or she leaves the bench immediately in shame and silence to protect the judiciary image and prestige, not his, of being attacked, shattered or fallen in the eyes of the litigants fearing most to undermine and erode the public's confidence and trust in their judicial system. Unlike there, here the statute or the rule requires the filing of the recusal motion to be absurdly decided by the same judge his recusal is sought. Judge Salas, the acting ruler on the case, along with "philosopher" Linares, the actual presiding Judge over the matters should have had much better served the integrity of the judiciary if both voluntarily [h]ad left the stage and departed from the matter as early as of ("May 16, 2017"). This unique memorandum recusal or rather admonishment would have been avoided and obviated. We do not and must not engage in a mockery farce of the system when the impartiality of the Court is undermined and emerged into question. This is the crucial point this recusal memorandum is intended to serve, assist and to achieve in the interest of the broken judicial system itself, not Abulkhair.
59. It should be pointed out here to serve the purpose, which derived of its fate. Waiting on the bus stop on Monday, (February 12, 2018) at approximately 8:30 at early morning rush hour in a very windy freezing day, a brand new SUV vehicle stopped to drop its passenger to commute to the city. A bright young very attractive Moslem lady in her eighteen or nineteen years of age, wearing unusual much tied black leather pants. Her stylish fashion with her very light black scarf, which fit neither head scarf or hijab, gave the impression to any stranger that she engaged in a model or (moda) fashion business promoting her elegant outfits when in fact she seemed like a freshmen student in one of New York universities. Less in a minute, the small Hispanic bus stopped looking for passengers. She was the only one went and knocked several times on its door, but to no avail. The driver ignored her and refused to open the door for her. She was shying and shaking her head twice and staring towards me in reluctance without murmuring a single word in dismay and disbelief. She was trying to say, did you believe that? Silently inside me, I am indeed drawing more deeply in the bottom of this awful ocean for decades. Her silence spread her question she was reluctant or unable from her anger appeared in her innocent eyes to utter in public. I took a closer look to see the driver. To my shock, I saw a Hispanic female not much older than her. To comfort the young lady after she stepped back to the side walk a couple feet away from where I was standing by spontaneously saying, clearly and loudly, "She's sick!![!]" When she heard me after she released her foot from the break departing slowly, she immediately stopped and opened the door. To my surprise, the young Moslem lady ran to travel with her. I realized then that she must be born American because her principles are far divergent from mine. I was further convinced that her silence will remain intact until the moment she reached her destination. She would not even bother to ask the "female" driver about her refusal to open the door for her because she knew that she has a losing argument. This is the way she was grow up and raised by her family to avoid confrontation with people in a hostile society contaminated with an evil hatred clouded with the poison environment triggered by September 11 event, plain and simple. If the driver disliked the way she looks, she simply should have opened the door and asked her to go "sit in the back seat" to remind us of the shameful Slavery Era.
60. Some critics and philosophical seculars of law may question the link of the mentioned event to the recusal motion. There is an obvious relevant factor must be considered above all. This was not an isolated incident to pass on or ignore hopping to be cured by itself. The unique model of highly modernize, discipline and politeness she presented herself, as an American born Moslem, had undoubtedly shown her undeniable intellectual and talent despite her silence. To that end, what crime, if any, an innocent pure soul like her, committed in order to deserve this kind of an immoral treatment and heinous religious discrimination in public in front of a group of diverse people.
61. The main relevant point here which this recusal memorandum is all about, what would have happened if this young Arabian woman decided to file a discrimination lawsuit in federal court against the Latina driver and her Hispanic transportation company to be held accountable for discriminating and humiliating her in public. Her meritorious complaint and public concern would automatically or rather "randomly" be assigned straight to all time "king of dismissal", "philosopher" Linares or Judge Salas to dismiss it without even reviewing it by rendering a transcripted opinion prepared and ready for all Moslem litigants or even Christians who carry Arabic last names. The core question here is, does she have the legal right under the constitution and law to question the impartiality of either Salas or Linares? Assuming if there is a single Arabic Christian, not a Moslem, judge assigned in any federal court, which we doubt, presiding over her case, does the Latina woman driver defendant with her Hispanic employer have the legal right under the constitution and law to question the impartiality of the Arabic judge? Of course they do, and their recusal requests must be honored and granted whether the highest court agrees or drinks from the ocean. In fact, Abulkhair would file the same recusal motion to remove an Arabic or Moslem judge on the basis of the same principle. Thus, she cannot and must not be facing the same kangarooing, inhumane, and barbaric discrimination in public and in court thereafter. How could she be convinced that the same "Banana Republic" background "mentality" and philosophy judge would have a remote mindset or would act differently from the one she faced in public for which both are far distant from her liberal open mind, which compelled her to remain silent to protect her wounded dignity and integrity before losing her identity in the eye of herself before the eye of the public. For that reason, we must answer the call to set the stage to prevent the next American Moslem generations from facing the unbearable, ugly darkness of discrimination we face in our life on a daily basis to justify the [ONLY] governmental abusive apparatus of which used and based on its delusional theory identified [ISLAM] as the main source of the probable cause.
62. We stand by the same phrase and word "sick" to counter those living among us with a sickness mentality, especially when they do the same to our African American brothers and sisters. The compelling reason motivated Abulkhair toward her situation in particular was based on the common culture and values we share. She definitely will share the awful incident with her family and friend. She has the right to do so. However, Abulkhair's principles must prevent her and others to say or claim to them that there were a group of people was waiting at the bus stop, stonily standing like stone statues in the desert and no one dared to speak out on my behalf to condemn the wrongdoing and the wrongdoer. All of them were reluctant to intervene and selected to remain silent like me, or rather decided to take the "Fifth" to avoid me. It was our moral obligation towards ourselves, not her to condemn this kind of misconduct and discrimination instantly regardless of the person sex, race, religion, or nationality in the same way we usually support our African American brothers and sisters who often confront with the same discrimination. Wrong [is] wrong. She certainly someday will find and read this part in any publication form and feels proudly to say, it was me. He did not let me down and looked the other way like others !![!]
63. The consequence of the bitter feeling that no one was able to stand up for her as an American who was born in this county weighs much worse to lose her identity to be proud of who she is. Unlike her, we need not search of identity. We are proud of whom we are, and the identity we brought forward with us to escape the unavoidable embarrassment in public. Yes, we are American but only on paper because the society decided to reject us. So we must live with one of our greatest public figure operative words engraved and crafted on his "statue" while riding a horse to admonish the worse brutal colonial empire called itself "The Great Britain" with contributing anything but great [:]
*"[I]f [I] Had Not Been Born An Egyptian –– [I] Would Have Wished To [B]e An Egyptian [.]"*
Of course, the beautiful meaning is lost in poor translation. An Arabic born American, like her, can make much greater translation if she speaks the native language first. Most of them do not. Thereby, do not lose them and discriminate against them to satisfy any lobby or entity. By the way, he was a brilliant young respectful attorney. We cannot label them there "professional liars" because it does not fit them there. Unlike here in America, they receive rewards and promotions for lying to the court. There, they knew and realized the severe consequences of losing their practice license and facing jail time if they were ever caught lying in any court procedures.
64. We did our part as a normal citizen towards her to keep her dream alive. We do not appease or please anyone for anything. The Congress has to do its part to secure that its citizens are protected from this cancerous discrimination. The Congress should not authorize the citizens to sue and provide immunity for the wrongdoers at the same time. The Congress should make it clear that an "absolute immunity" shall [not] be given to any federal or state law enforcement officials or officers whose break the law, and the justices or judges whose willfully decide and determine to degrade the constitution and to deviate from the rule of law to enforce theirs to eventually end it to be "held in a cloak of secrecy with the letter of the law in the dumpster." Id. The Congress should restrain the pro state or federal government judges from dismissing civil rights complaints when a genuine allegation involved regardless how badly the defective pleading may be unless the court on its motion appoint a pro bono counsel. Otherwise, it does not make sense. The Congress should make it clear, that when the litigant raises a challenge before the court to compel the defendant to produce evidence or legal document to legalize and authorize the unlawful discrimination or conduct in which the action stemmed from, to show complying with the mandatory statute in question, the district court shall [NOT] grant defendant's dismissal motion if where and when the defendant fails to produce and meet the challenge, as it is clearly the case here. The frivolous abused rules of court shall [NOT] and must [NOT] supersede either the statute or the constitution in the absence of complying with the jurisdictional statue. Otherwise, the district judges legislate from their bench and deceive the Congress otherwise by their mockery assertion claiming as such Congress did not intend to abrogate this and that to cover up for their wrong, prejudicial, biased and motivated rulings, opinions to deviate from the rule of law with [a] cunning more than "vulpine" in order to deliberately deceive the victimized litigants in the process.
65. In a very "short statement" as possible, [w]e have nothing to hide. [W]e have nothing to fear. They can keep their "surveillance" as long as they want. We concern about our life and safety. Both are at the highest risk. They chase us with their vehicles on the streets everywhere. When we spot them, they speed towards us in a very reckless, maniac and irresponsible manner to intentionally harm us. They apparently have their own childish mentality and extremely dangerous bad temper, which is alarming. They carry guns. We do not. We never will. We do indeed have the biggest gun of all time which no one can have nor buy. The remarkably and highly prestigious gun of words [NOT] the gun of bullets !![!] Their irrational behavior and action alarmed and alerted us. Who would forget the "Newark FBI" agent who shot his wife, an "Newark FBI" agent too, with her lover, another "Newark FBI" agent at the "Newark FBI Office" after he caught them in the early morning hours discussing the "Middle East" foreign policy "engagement" and how to surveillance American Moslem like Abulkhair. Upon receiving a copy of this recusal from Judge Linares or Salas, Abulkhair does not know how long he will remain alive. Because Abulkhair criticized their series TV "FBI Files" to be changed to "FBI Failures" after the hotel horrific and heinous mass shooting in his previous pleadings, they get rid of or rather knocked out the entire channel from his television. Abulkhair cannot trust them. The American Public's confidence and trust has already faded away no matter whom thinks or claims otherwise. The matters involved here impose much greater concern than a single person or group discrimination problem. They are the values and principles we decide to live with and leave behind us afterward.
66. We have to rethink to make sense of what we face on the ground in the real world. Shall we ask ourselves, is this the real "freedom" we come and invite the outsider to experience and transport to their back home? Freedom is not a funny word to utter from one mouth to another. Freedom is extraordinary wonderful phenomenon flourishing of mix of beautiful feeling, living and enjoying way of life. Does any of all can be found here? Shall we ask the "Lady of Liberty" herself about how she sees feels or found any at all? Surly, she will implore us to bury her face under the water to hide her tears and agony from the shame surrounding her from everywhere, from the East to West and from the North to South. She will tell us that she ended standing in the wrong place at the wrong time. She will tell us that she is unable to speak and preferred to remain silent fearing from being profiled and oppressively put under the "FBI surveillance" day and night. She will frankly tell the world this was not the place meant for me to be standing proudly. They lied to me when they promised me to be standing in the center of the most prestigious culture and phenomenon, sophisticated civilization ever known to the world over the edge of the imaginary spectacular view of the Mediterranean Sea shining across from and towards the Suez Canal and the Red Sea to inspire and expend the spiritual and affectionate light of freedom and knowledge to the dark Asia and throughout the entire world from the Land of the Greatest Civilization ever known to mankind. This is what my creator had told me as his wish and living will. They brought me here in the "Land of Slavery" that ordered them to "sit down on the back seat of the bus" against their will to discriminate against them. They end me here against my will because Egypt had a corrupt ruler was sinking in debt and could not afford to have me there. Had my creator known that my final destiny would end here, he would rather never had squandered his talent, time and energy to create me for his life time love affair with the Pharaonic History he was captivated and fascinated with and worshiped. There are many times when visitors ("dreamers") stare at me, I love to inform them that they have a statue but not liberty. Please remove me from this bloody, hostile and dangerous environment I can no longer stand seeing me face to face to their real barbaric torture "statue" at Guantanamo Bay.
67. The "Lady of Liberty" calls upon the talented and devoted Egyptian attorneys to answer her call to protect this marvel, precious and priceless lily of art for the sake of the entire world to be relocated where it originally belongs. It sounds little "bizarre" to those who are hardly trying to portray and impose their deceptive false image upon the world. The Korean "playboy" carries his "gun" on his shoulder. He showed no mercy for his own family or anyone stands in his way. He knows well what he is doing and what he is capable of. They do not. We must not wait for a disaster to happen and to cry hard later for the loss of the treasure and cherished iconic statue misplaced there in the first place. The "Lady of Liberty Statuette" does [not] belong there.
68. The "Lady of Liberty" does not represent what she was created and stands for. The remarkable history which was waiting upon her arrival was limited to the brutal and bloody "civil war" and the rest is history. Not to mention "the right to bear arms" to protect us from the surrounding jungle to hunt the wild lions everywhere, which later showed its negative effect to the opposite to what meant to serve. The "Lady of Liberty" name tells all without translation. Does her name meaning exist today or vanished? Whether a symbolic "statue of liberty" or freedom flag, liberty is a flourishing feeling in living in the real world, not a self-delusional "word" of an imaginary imagination. America transferred badly to become the most brutal "policing state" in the entire world. The ("Guantanamo Bay University of the Academic and Satanic Barbaric Torture and Humiliation of All Human Rights") loudly and clearly speaks for itself. This is the symbolic actual statuette existed in the real world, which has shiny shown and known to the world whether they agree or not. It must be and meant to be there, [NOT] the "Lady of Liberty" after she joined the movement force of "METO" and "TIMESUP" for her as well. She has no interest to have a recourse to the "International Court", shying away from the embarrassment of being labeled as a "litigious" lady until they compel her to do so. Abulkhair does not have any channel of communication because the "land of freedom" cut off his "freedom" and left him with no access to a single email address for the obvious reason described above. Egyptian lawyers should feel free to file suit using his name [ONLY] for that purpose on his behalf and nothing else. The fact and message cannot be much clearer than it is.
69. The unrealistic and unbalance language and meaning of the "Second Amendment" [MUST] disturb and disrupt the conscience of any decent and reasonable human being living in a civilized society, [NOT] a "Kangaroo Society" or a "Secret Society" claiming "freedom" for all. The unambiguous simplified definition of the "right to bear arms" [is] unmistakably meant [t]he right [t]o kill, plain and simple. Premeditated murder can never be interpreted nor associated with any mental illnesses no matter how hardly or expressly the "professional liars" and the "perverters of justice" argued to deceive themselves before others. The "mental problem" began and stemmed directly from the malicious, awkward, and controversial language up there. The founders of this particular language intended to serve the hostile environment and the primitive culture and time surrounding it to fit the need, spare life and protect property. [T]his era [h]as long passed and should have its language as well with it. Hence, the "Second Amendment" should have been [abolished] entirely and its inhumane, wild, and ugly language in encouraging violence, should have been obviated more than a century ago. To come later to blame fake or failure on the part of the unfounded basis of a "mental problem" to excuse or actually justify [an] animal "terrorist" shooter regardless of his religion, is a preposterous theory at best. The real "mental problem" must be remained in operation inside those who authorize and provide the shooter with the guns to shoot the beautiful rising roses and flowers who trusted the failure government, namely the "FBI" to protect them and secure and ensure their safety in schools to learn in a peaceful environment equal to their parents and the generation that came before them without leaving them to live with the nightmare of the most heinous massacre and scare for the rest of their lives. The corrupt government let them down despite all of the obvious warning signs and indications evidenced in all of the shooters' incidents. Simply, because they are very busy distracting and focusing their unlawful "surveillance" to [ONLY]] monitor those innocent American [MOSLEMS] who potentially profiled and identified as the "usual suspect" under their false "radar" without even bothering to obtain the proper (FISA) Court Order. Until they realize that their own growing "terrorists" are far horrific, vicious and extremely much worse than the "Islamic Terrorists", the innocent roses and flowers souls will continue to endure the unbearable tragedy and pain as the fallen victims in the same trap set to harm them again and again, time after time. Albeit, they claimed that their "heartbroken", but doing almost nothing to fix or cure it. Candidly, [i]f all of the legislators, including the executive branches of the federal and states government wake up one day, suffering and agonizing of losing their love ones in a horrific shooting tragedy, there will be no single one of them eager to claim his still a loyal defender there to protect the "Second Amendment" right. They will all anonymously and favorably vote the next day to abolish it for good without even debate. But, as the old primitive Egyptian proverb emphasized, "[A]s long as far away from my (- - -) who cares !![!]" No one stood up to say, this [is] wrong. We care. Until then, get rid of your amendment and clean the stores from all dangerous chemical materials [b]efore asking the public if they: "See Something - - Say Something" because the bright flower Moslem lady, who was denied access to enter a public transportation and discriminated against for her belief and chose to remain silent on her own behalf, how then would she be able to speak on behalf of others who deliberately have chosen to profile and discriminate against her. She did not even bother to open her mouth to utter one single word to "thank" the man who was the reason to get her on that bus from the feeling of anger boiling and burning inside her gut. Unlike others, this one we take it more sensitively, seriously and personally within the same anguish and pain suffered by the parents of those fallen roses and flowers innocent souls all over the places with no end in sight as long as the "language" of the "Second Amendment" existed. Guns belong [ONLY] to the law enforcement personnel [.] The public should send a clear message to make sure they must lose their seats on both sides in Congress and the White House to compel them to end and bury for good the "license to kill" language or let them set home crying for losing their prestigious seats [.] Enough is enough [.] If the strayed government has the desire to charge Abulkhair for his dissent and disgust of the killing "license" of the greatest of all time constitutional mandate of the "Second Amendment" for which no other single nation in the entire world honor or abide by, please "Go Ahead, Make My Day". (This opinion, conviction and portion concerning the unbalanced disturbed "Second Amendment" enraged language were grandfathered in mind for far long time and written before the latest shooting incident).
70. The phrase "See Something - - Say Something" was precisely crafted by a corrupt New Yorker politician aiming his intention to deliberately target against a specific familiar group publicly known to [ONLY] single out the "Islamic Terrorists", but [not] American Jewish or Christian Terrorists. They did say a lot of things. Did anybody listen to them? The "firstborn Satan" "terrorist" perpetrator himself said a lot of things. His posted messages even went way far to challenge the authority whom supposedly responsible to protect the public. Did they listen to him or give any concern? They ignored him along with other decent citizens because he is not the typical [MOSLEM] "jihady" they are waiting for to fit the description their slogan stands for. At the same time, in their effort to offend and deceive the public without offering an apology first, they claimed that they could not find the source of the posted message or when it was posted or by whom. It was an outright big ugly fat lie. Do not think the undersigned would ever buy this farce fabricated assertion, which was way far from the reality. They must know very well the exact time, location and from which computer or phone any message generated anywhere around the globe by whomever. They were able to track and penetrate Abulkhair's two email addresses, freezing them to eventually blocked them for which violation and misconduct led to Google Action after three (3) years of warning Google to back off or else, but to no avail. They begged us to choose the latter. See Abulkhair v. Google, by "googling" or binging.
71. After their credibility was undermined in the eye of the public, they come later to admit their "failure" and offering their apology to claim that, the wild animal has [a] "mental problem" issue. This outrageous bogus claim offended and infuriated the undersigned for those sweet lovely souls who their lives and dreams were shattered and cut short by an animal monster whose showed no respect whatsoever for human life. It is fine to label the same kind of crime committed by [a] Moslem as [an] "act of terrorism", but [a] "mental problem" cause to any and all crimes that horrific in nature committed by Jewish or Christian American "terrorist" or others around the world. What is not right is trying to fool and deceive the public or someone, like Abulkhair, who had read the sensational passionate, compassionate, and tragically dramatic, Le Miserable, beginning at the age of ten and three times afterward, plus one time in English, persuading him to believe in [a] theory of "mental problem" frivolous justification
72. Regardless of all knowledge, literature and philosophy, by placing all "in the dumpster", there can be no doubt to any logical person, that the sophisticated premediated plan, the execution style with the ferocious nature of killer left of his bloody scene, has proved beyond all doubts, that [t]he "mental talent" of this ugly animal showed and orchestrated highly unique skills, has weigh far exceeding the "mental stability" of all of the presidents ever sat in the ***White House from the "founding father" to the current "fifth grade" tweeter combined, along with all of the directors of the FBI and CIA agencies since their establishment combined, despite his obvious failure in education with all those who tried to discredit his mentality to cover up another failure in progress day after day with no an end in sight. A student's failure does not necessarily mean stupidity. It is rather a distraction of mind towards something in mind. Similarly, to what we face and confront here. The most revered greatest exceptional genius Egyptian philosopher and philosophical literature ever lived on the face of the earth called "the literature gigantic", "the mobile library" and the brilliant distinguished author of the series publication of all big story and genius literature and philosophy anyone ever written of the "Geniuses", had only accomplished an elementary school degree. He was the only one who stood up with his great moral courage armed with his unattainable and beyond reach "weapon" of words to lecture, condemn and admonish the evil Nazi dictator when all the cowards in every corner of the world remained silent, or rather had chosen to take the "fifth" to stay under the ground. His unique book triggered the animal Nazi manic to vow to hang him in the center square of Cairo if he occupied Egypt. Against his will, the corrupt king issued a royal decree to force him to move to Sudan for his own safety and benefit. The army of the genuine Egyptian Pharaohs who was set up on the front lines defeated the Nazi Germans and the British later took credit to claim victory and broke their accord in order to betray and flee from their promise of independence to finally deny the Nazi dictator his satanic wish. He rejected the honorary doctorate offered to him by the Oxford University challenging them by questioning of whom possess the knowledge to discuss it with him. He was the only one on the planet ever known to reject the famous "Noble Prize" award and demonized and admonished its "owner" himself by describing him as the evil criminal minded who invented and brought forward the inhumane ideology of "weapon of mass destruction" to the world when and where the others are craving or rather panting for it. Sadly, he left an unparalleled legacy that no one will never be able to translate his phenomenon philosophy, unique literate and/or remarkable prose in any language.
73. This failure "high school" criminal minded monster had committed his heinous crime and he did not stop there to surrender or take his own life like other previous murderers with [a] "mental problem" have done. His demon vulpine maneuver to immediately blend in among the other victimized innocent students drafted his astonishing escape theory from his bloody crime scene without being detected, or even stirred any suspicions from the "FBI" well trained "smart" agents, or the local police officers standing there and surrounding the scene to secure his arrest. He acted and portrayed himself as "innocent" when, in fact, he is a cold blooded murderer and walked his way out confidently deceiving the authority. He orchestrated effectively the imagination of all the "Hollywood" great escape scenarios to undermine any claim of any possible mental health issue existed and to discredit otherwise. His despicable and unthinkable crime evidenced his advance satanic vengeance of a more intelligent criminal than those who tried to discredit him to convince and conclude otherwise. But definitely a coward animal who snapped against those innocent souls who did not contribute to his own failure. His premeditated execution style plan chosen and orchestrated on Valentine's Day intended to send a clear message and revenge to those who were still in his mind, was not by a coincidence from a "broken heart", not mind of an evil monstrous manic, who could not get over his raged jealousy. He must not live to neither enjoy nor breath the life he willingly and unfairly deprived others from to sit in his jail cell enjoying and viewing in his sickness anger criminal mind his bloody retaliatory revenge over and over again in order to deter other animals out there from pursuing his monstrous massacre path. The mastermind, the "firstborn Satan" animal, "allegedly" with [a] "mental problem", was one single step away from committing the "perfect crime" and getting away with it. Thanks to the blessed "luck" which stood firm against his satanic, brutal and barbaric crime to face and suffer the same fate he unjustly imposed upon others. Did these well planned and executed acts and conduct of a serious criminal mind can fit the characterization of someone suffering from any mental problem. He chose life he denied to others. He showed no remorse for his satanic massacre except for being caught to escape the death penalty in the same manner he escaped the crime scene. Hence, [a]n inexcusable "mental problem" identification here is making an unusual cynical sarcastic of the American People since the monster was not under any "radar" or "surveillance" of any kind to target or monitor his mail, email, twitter, Facebook, or phone, for which all must be explicated and implicated without any warning no one detected those discrediting his sound mentality. In spite of all, they were in fact, sufficiently warned about the animal shooter and his intent and motivation. But, they did nothing because they are obviously very busy distracting their attention and focus towards those Middle Eastern Moslems who fall within their category and under their surveillance like Abulkhair. Please do not be sarcastic to make the rest of the world scorn and laugh at us. The real "mental problem" still remains out there within the untouchable "Second Amendment" no one dares to talk about. There is no such thing as "guns control" –––– It is out of control laws. Gun is [NOT] the answer. [T]he repeal of the "Second Amendment" [is] the [ONLY] proper answer. (*** The computer was suddenly crushed down during Abulkhair was writing the above sentence on Sunday, February 18, 2018 at 2:20 P.M. by those who could not locate the source of the message posted by the evil shooter).
74. Despite his advanced warnings to carry out his threat to commit his crime with his background troubling vengeance history, no one ever had tampered with his regular mail, his email, messages or blocked him access to his email property, or intervened with his vicious threatened language and writing to freeze or crush the computer upon him, as they have done with Abulkhair. Nor has his phone or computer were subjected to any monitoring or wiretapping. Otherwise, this unimaginable gruesome scene and tragedy would have been prevented and obviated entirely.
75. [W]e openly write in the light. We DO [NOT] and must [NOT] write or operate "cowardly" in the dark like others. Shall we share some punishment or blame for it because the constitution and the rule of law deterred or rather "held in a cloak of secrecy with the letter of the law in the dumpster." Id. An immoral interfering with anyone writing does [not] appear to agree with "the right to petition the government", not to mention, the illusive "freedom of speech" where nowhere can be found, or simply is no longer existence.
76. The United States of (!!!/???) should be more than proud and honored to have a genuine native Son of Pharaohs, like Abulkhair, accepted living among the "barbaric" and the bloody "Kangaroo Society", which intended to single him out to spy on him with others for their only fate identified and known as "[ISLAM]" as the vehicle motivated to justify the "probable cause" to warrant their unwarranted surveillance. Unless the immoral corrupt United States Government brought forward the (FISA) Court Order authorizing its continual surveillance targeting at the heart of the undersigned's religious faith, neither the corrupt court nor judge, [NOT] even the Congress has the authority to dismiss Abulkhair's meritorious claims against the idiotic and moronic FBI officials and agents regardless of any and all frivolous assertions of "failure to state a claim" or otherwise. And whoever disagrees or dislikes this fundamental cornerstone canon, bring for himself a silver spoon to eat from the "shit" of which where the "shithole" was originally generated, or rather established in order to enhance and advance the darkness of the "secret society" or the "policing state" to keep it intact until the reckoning day approach to lift up those oppressed and end the world misery for good. ([W]e defer and refer to the famous and romantic language uttered from the "Oval Office" of "the leader of the free world" for which [is] the least-friendliest from our own "sharp language") [.]
77. The clear message intended by the wrongdoers clearly implied that American Moslems are [NOT] covered under umbrella of the U.S. law, particularly the (FISA). In support of this reality, the District Court's dismissal further implied that American Moslems are [NOT] covered under the unrealistic banner of "justice for all" or "equal protection under the laws" to get even with them to pay for the crime they did not commit. The fact cannot be stressed further.
78. To that fact, we made a systematic effort to flexibly offering ourselves for interrogation. To that end, on many occasions, we tried to cut the useless and endless chase by voluntarily offering ourselves to be interrogated by them with[out] the presence of any assistant counsel, orally and in writing, during the historical, unique, unprecedented, unparalleled exceptional application for citizenship for which was pending for its entire long ten (10) years period under the excuse of pretending "waiting the FBI national security clearance", which never happened in the entire short history of this nation. But all of them have so far failed to silence the stubborn surveillance or the deliberate ten (10) years "delay" to process a simple application for citizenship that had long waited for the "FBI national security clearance" in the circles that surround the entire justice department with all of its intelligent agencies at its disposal at that point in time. They simply chose not to and ignored us or rather disregarded the generous invitation. They never even responded as ordinary responsible people usually do. Simply because the obvious probable cause still existed, is [ISLAM] and nothing else to discuss there. Nothing more –––– Nothing less. We cannot change this. We cannot either change our cherished and proud language whether "sharp language" or "strong language" as characterized by the "professional liars" in order to justify getting even with Abulkhair to punish him for it, instead of adjudicating based on the merits of the claims and allegations presented. The Mighty himself, not the "King of kings", does [NOT] have the power over it. Otherwise, [H]e can answer that if he believes to choose otherwise. Then, [H]e must answer to himself, why [H]e brought Abulkhair here in the first place when [H]e knew in advance that [i]t was against his will and desire [.] Abulkhair has never been a "dreamer" of anything. At no time, the "American dream" has never come across his dream to wake up later on the "American nightmare" to realize that it was too little, and too late.
79. Here [w]e go again, at the time we decide to travel on any airplane, we urge and invite them to welcome abroad at that time with the maximum number possible and available of the FBI and CIA agents together to sit side-by-side beside us. So, we can sit comfortable, enjoy the ride, and relax to feel secure and ensure that no harm whatsoever will ascend from the ground towards us. [W]e freely waive our right to question the need or requirement of any of (FISA) parameters for it. Can they meet the voluntary invitation offer and challenge this time? We doubt it. They try to delude or convince us and others, who are unaware of their unlawful activities, that they fear and worry about us when in fact and reality it is the opposite or the other way around. We are profoundly concerned about our unique, oldest, and prestigious renowned Name [ABULKHAIR] which derived and drifted from its Pharaonic sprang origin before America ever was discovered or even located on the world map to be dragged or associated thereafter with any false fabricated malicious accusations from those who their credibility is already undermined and known around the world. Simply, this distinguished famously renowned name does [NOT] stand for "evil" but the "contrary" [.]
80. Since the beginning of 1990, all Moslems of Middle Eastern descent who live in New Jersey and New York, with no exception to the undersigned, were under surveillance and their phones wiretapped to this very day. There are thousands of them, if not millions, who are unaware or not paying attention to their surroundings or otherwise afraid of coming forward to face the same saga. We were alerted of our phone was and still remained bugged. We give [NO] concern then or now. Our concern arose [ONLY] when our life and safety became on the line after September 11 aftermath to be recklessly and dangerously chased on the streets everywhere like criminals for the [ONLY] crime we are aware of, of being a [MOSLEM]. Nothing more –––– Nothing less. At this juncture, we filed our lawsuit in question to question the legality and reason for the endless surveillance. In essence, seventeen (17) years has passed since September 11 and twenty-eight (28) years since its inception. What the result was, if any, they have accomplished. [T]here is [NONE]. The average paltry bill to cover Abulkhair's surveillance for the last seventeen (17) years period would have a price tag of at least $170 million dollars. It does make sense now to convince the taxpayers by focusing on the wrong target, and to keep the unrealistic slogan "to protect American People" when and where the undeniable evidences and events look and fly far the other way. Had they spent fraction of seventeen hundred ($1700) dollars to "investigate" [ONLY] the obvious warning sign posted by the animal shooter himself, this unbearable burden of painful tragedy would have been prevented and obviated.
81. No an ignorant "philosopher", "professor" or "Middle East foreign policy expert" should ever construe Abulkhair's elite thoughts or erudite writing to promote nor motivate to help any political party anywhere. [H]is strong conscientious objection against gun is [NOT] a new idea. The feds Defendants are very aware of that fact more than three (3) decades ago. They decided to bully Abulkhair for their ego thinking he may be intimidated. They are wrong. Abulkhair was born with clean hands and must depart with them intact. [W]hen our hands are clean and [w]e walk straight –––– [w]e can then stand up [t]o face [t]he "King of kings", [not] the arrogant "FBI" agents [.] The same principles deny him to contaminate his clean hands have denied him to cast a vote as well, and never will. He never even registered to vote in anywhere. It is about time to rethink and let the Marshals take over by creating an investigation unit within and let the FBI get another job. They perform a great job much better than the FBI. They served three (3) summonses upon Google defendants in "California" in one day. We have not yet served the same three (3) summonses for almost a year upon three (3) "professional liars" defendants in "New Jersey", who are ironically associated with the "Office of Attorney Ethics", because the "rusted brain" former governor, "La vache quirit", the crying "dreamer" for the "presidency", wanted so badly to personally retaliate and get even with Abulkhair for assuring him in advance his absolute failure to reach there before he even officially declared his "remarkable" run. In doing so, he jumped over the jammed "Bridge Gate" to create another "Summons Gate" to further abuse his power as a governor, and more importantly though, as a former "professional liar" as a "U.S. Attorney" in the absence of any consequences. In addition, they tamper with Abulkhair's pleading by delaying it, and deliberately "blackout" his evidence and blaming the scanner which is perfectly fine. All of the unwarranted retaliatory punishments is because Abulkhair criticized him in his correspondence of (May 5, 2014) in responding to the "Office of Attorney Ethics" initial refusal to investigate his grievance against his former "professional liar" by emphasizing [:]
"I wonder how, could the thick, rusty brain Governor, be eager and have the presidential ambition to run for the presidency office as a former professional liar when the office for which suppose to investigate the current professional liars is closing to the public without a notice and he does not even have a control of it. How mockery this will be? I wonder how, will the Governor, a man highly lauded for his service during Storm Sandy, view this? How will such conduct reflect on him?" Id.
82. We do not force any one to agree or believe what we say or believe in. Take it or leave it [!] We were born to be free in mind and free in thinking. As another distinguished Egyptian military commander freely declared to the entire world to admonish the corrupt royal ruler whose castle was under siege together with the brutal British occupiers [:]
**"[O]ur Mothers Delivered Us Free –––– And [N]o One Can Take Our Freedom From U[s]."** In contrast, "the free world" believes in their ideology of [a] different freedom.
83. However, the proper and valid idea of reversing one's decision weighs much further self-respect and dignity. Rather than a stubborn, opinionated, closed minded, questioning the formulated format not the facts. In Abulkhair v. Bush, the dishonest judge instantly dismissed the complaint because he never reviewed. Abulkhair filed two pages' reconsideration pointed out his overlooked fact. He reversed himself. In his vulpine maneuver to retaliate for his failure to review, he suggested that Abulkhair should bring the United States as defendant if he wished to proceed with his claims. Abulkhair did not have to bring any claims against U.S. But, the setting trap as happened was to give him the reason to dismiss the complaint by letting the wrongdoers get away with the ten (10) years delayed long overdue pending application for citizenship on the false fabricated "waiting FBI national security clearance" when in fact [ISLAM] was and still remain[s] the soul and sole probable cause for the historical deliberate delay. At this juncture, Abulkhair complied and gave the judge the tools to dismiss it on the basis requirement of the FTCA Notice. It has become the most primary case law referred to since for its obvious wrong reason. Ironically, without suing the president, whose Abulkhair predicted his victory in summer of 2000 when he was extremely far behind in the national election "polls" addressing him, "The Honorable President of the United States" while he was the Governor of Texas, Abulkhair's ten (10) years "delayed" application would never have been granted to this very day. What they do not realize is that all of their wrong, useless, retaliatory and discriminatory decisions will not only degrade and damage the rule of law. Consequently they will altogether end [t]o be "[h]eld in a cloak of secrecy with the letter of the law in the dumpster" and to be forever forgotten [.] This great genuine legacy will be the only remaining evidence for everyone to tell, convey and serve history to be permanent and remembered to shame, blemish and admonish the corrupt "Kangaroo Judiciary" until its final day eventually.
84. We need a neutral judge in Trenton, out of "Newark", who willingly to step forward to each matter separately on his own without any reassignment order from anybody to order the FBI to cease and desist all of their useless, nuisance and nonsense surveillance forthwith until the conclusion of the matter. Similar to the judge who recently released the refugees from their hidden church. The other judge should order Google's "pharaohs" to remove their "disabled" status from Abulkhair's property email account forthwith until further notice or decision from the court. Judge Salas has the absolute power under the constitution and law to do so. But, she will not displease the corrupt government or "pharaonic" Google. She would rather deviate from the Rule of Law than to abide by it to rule against the wrongdoers. If not, the Philadelphia venue would be necessary to restore the public's trust in fairly adjudication of these outstanding matters. Abulkhair is entitled to have a fair hearing before a decent judge to compel the corrupt government to show its (FISA) Court Order or the dismissal will end in the trash basket where it belongs. This is the law and the rule of law.
85. With all of that in mind, and pursuant to the precisely clarified plain mandatory language provided by the 28 U.S.C. § 455, Judge Esther Sales, along with "philosopher" Jose Linares [MUST] divorce Abulkhair's matters forever against the FBI and Google, and leave the ugly and shameful scene peacefully in silence to honor the rule of law, and therefore a new judge, man or woman, known for his/her "moral courage" in either Trenton or Philadelphia should review the alleged facts and events and to voluntarily preside over each matter separately to assure and ensure the impartiality in the interest of the polestar justice.
By: /s/ Assem A. Abulkhair